Skip to content
PIAGOGO! Site Ready

Reporting

The proof, already built.

Seven reports named for the questions clients and auditors actually ask — coverage, gaps, evidence, site readiness — run when you need them or scheduled so they arrive without anyone remembering.

The GO! Site Ready skills matrix report, being run against selected people and skills

Working with PIAGO

  • Frontline Equipment Maintenance
  • BRW Transport
  • Hydrapower
  • Kerembla
  • Premier Plant Repairs & Fabrication
  • Whiteman Welding
Customer stories

How it works

From a question, to something you can send.

The report picker

Step 01

Pick the question, not the dataset

Each report is named for the question it answers rather than the table it reads. Whether your workforce is covered, what they are missing, whether a site is ready for the jobs on it — you choose the question and the report knows where to look.

Want to see what an expiring-skills report would show across your people?

The full list

Everything in reporting.

Skills matrix

Your whole workforce against the requirements of their roles, as one grid. The report you hand to a client who wants to see coverage rather than take your word for it.

Training needs analysis

What each person is missing for the work they are assigned to, so the training you book is the training that unblocks somebody rather than the course that was due anyway.

Skills and attainment list

The detailed attainment records behind the summary — dates, evidence and status, in the form an internal or external audit asks for.

Person details

Contact and asset details for your people, exportable. The list you need when somebody has to be reached, mobilised or accounted for.

Compliance report

Whether a specific site is ready for the jobs assigned to it — the whole question in one place, rather than checking each worker and each machine in turn.

Tools list

Everything in the tools register, which is tracked separately from plant because a test-and-tag interval is not a service interval.

Scheduled reports

Any of the above, on an interval, delivered to an inbox. An expiring-skills report every Monday morning surfaces the problem while there is still a week to fix it.

Export and hand over

Reports leave the system in a form somebody else can open, so proving it does not mean giving a client a login or a screenshot.

The difference

What changes when the evidence is already assembled.

How it usually goes

  • The client asks you to prove it and somebody spends an afternoon in Excel.
  • You find out what is missing when a worker is already turned around.
  • Nobody runs the check the week they are busiest, which is the week it matters.
  • Every client wants the evidence in a different shape.
  • The tools and the plant are tracked somewhere else again.

With GO! Site Ready

  • The report is already built, and it exports in a form you can send.
  • Training needs are named per person before the job, not after it.
  • It is scheduled, so the busy week is the one it still lands in.
  • One set of records, filtered to whatever a given client asked for.
  • People, equipment and tools each have their own report off the same register.

Questions about reporting

We can already export a spreadsheet. What is different?
An export is a copy of what you typed; a report is a question answered against the requirements your clients actually set. The skills matrix is not a list of tickets — it is your people measured against what their roles demand, so the gaps are the output rather than something you work out afterwards. And an export is only as current as the moment it was made, which is the problem it was meant to solve.
Who can run these — does it have to be the compliance person?
Anyone with access to the reporting area, which is the point of scheduling them as well. The reports most worth having are the ones that arrive when the person who would have run them is flat out, so they are set once and delivered rather than remembered.
Can a client get the report directly?
You send it. Reports export in a form you can attach or forward, so the client gets the evidence without being given access to your register. What you share stays your decision rather than a permission setting.
Does it cover equipment, or only people?
Both, and tools separately again. The compliance report asks whether a site is ready for the jobs on it, which means the people and the plant assigned to those jobs, and the tools list covers the test-and-tag side. Splitting them across systems is what puts the pairing back together by hand.
How far ahead can a scheduled report look?
Far enough to act on. The useful window is the one that matches how long a renewal actually takes — a coal mine workers' health assessment can be weeks to book in regional Queensland, so a report that only looks thirty days ahead tells you about a problem you can no longer prevent.

Run it against your own people.

Bring a requirements matrix a client sent you and we will show you what the reports return for your real sites and roles, not a sample dataset.

Not the person who signs it off?

Send it to your GM